Irangate

At the height of the Iran-Iraq war, when the American aid to Iraq was at its zenith, some high-ranking American officials indulged in a sideshow of realpolitiks that probably amazed even seasoned masters of intrigue such as Saddam. Irangate, as it became known, took place secretly in 1986, & involved high-ranking members of the Reagan Administration illegally selling arms to Iran, partly in exchange for the hoped-for release of American hostages in Lebanon. The proceeds from the sales were then covertly funneled to buy arms for the Nicaraguan Contras, another illegal act.
The participants of this scheme alleged that they had President Reagan's unofficial blessing, & agreed with their Iranian hosts that there is a need for a non-hostile regime in Baghdad", & that we can bring our influence to bear with certain friendly Arab nations" to get rid of Saddam. All this was being said privately, while publicly the U.S. was leading an arms embargo against Iran, & letting it be known that it would not countenance an Iranian victory! Small matter that these tactics of double dealing on the part of the U.S. were perpetrating a war in which tens of thousands of young Arabs & Persians were dying on the battlefield. All this back-stabbing must have driven home two important lessons to Saddam: The first was that the U.S. would intrigue against him when he was weak; the second was that it would grovel before him when he was strong.
This lesson was dramatically confirmed by two events the following year. In early 1987, Iran threatened to attack Kuwaiti oil tankers in the Gulf, which were carrying much of Iraq's oil to market. The U.S., still smarting from the humiliation of the Irangate exposure & eager to do damage control" with Saddam, offered to re-flag" the Kuwaiti ships & ensure their protection by giving them a military escort through the Gulf. In the same year, an Iraqi warplane accidentally" fired an Exocet missile which hit the American warship U.S.S. Stark, killing 37 sailors. Saddam moved quickly, apologizing effusively, & promising compensation of $27 million to the victims' families. The event was soon forgotten. Interestingly enough, after the August invasion of Kuwait, it was revealed that Iraq never actually made compensation.

Congress Calls for Sanctions

Although the Iraq-Iran war ended in stalemate in 1988, Iraq did not demobilize, but rather continued its military buildup unabated. In the spring of 1990, Saddam began making threatening statements about Israel, vowing to burn half the country" if Israel took any hostile action towards Iraq, as it had in 1981, when it bombed Iraq's nuclear reactor. This threat was taken to mean that Iraq was willing to use chemical weapons, & coupled with the gas attacks which had already been perpetrated on the Iraqi Kurds, caused some members of the U.S. Congress to call for sanctions to be imposed on Iraq.

White House Support for Saddam

The Bush administration, however, motivated by political expediency, actively opposed any form of sanctions & instead counseled forbearance & appeasement of Saddam, literally until the day Iraq invaded Kuwait. With Iran's potential for exporting revolution largely crippled by the costly war, the White House now saw in Saddam a possible counterweight to the last remaining radical Arab strongman in the Middle East, Haffez Assad of Syria. The Administration also hoped to exert a moderating influence on Saddam in the hopes that he would eventually forsake his hard-line rejectionist stance towards Israel, America's premier client state in the region. As one Administration official subsequently recounted, the policy was essentially, wean the Iraqis away from nuclear & chemical proliferation, tie them economically closer to the U.S. & the Western world; try to use carrots, rather than sticks, in moderating their behavior."
In December of 1989, Congress voted to end Iraqi access to loans from the Export Import Bank, due to Iraqi gassing of civilian Kurds a few years earlier. In January 1990, President George Bush vetoed this ban, citing America's national interest". In February, 1990, the Voice of America called Iraq a police state. Secretary of State James Baker instructed Ambassador April Glaspie to apologies to Saddam.
In the spring of 1990, Saddam began making veiled threats to his Gulf neighbors, & staged military maneuvers in the neutral territory on Kuwait's border. Iraqi resentment toward Kuwait & the other Gulf states had been building since the 1988 cease-fire. In Saddam's eyes, the rich Arabs, & indeed the World were not sufficiently grateful for Iraq's sacrifice in the war. Iraqis had bled & died in Iran in a war that had protected the sheikdoms from subversion & conquest by the non-Arab Persians. Deeply in debt (primarily to Saudi Arabia & Kuwait) as a result of the Gulf war, Saddam warned them that they must forgive his debt & furnish more aid or suffer reprisals. He also warned Kuwait that it must stop over-producing oil, as this kept oil prices down, thus robbing Iraq of much-needed income. And finally, he accused Kuwait of stealing Iraqi oil from the Rumaila oil field, which straddled the Iraq-Kuwait border. In March, Saddam gave a hint of what the future held when he abrogated all border agreements between the two countries.
President George Bush, alarmed by these inflammatory statements & actions, sent a Senate delegation to Iraq, which apologized again for the Voice of America criticism & conveyed Bush's desire for better relations. Senator Howard Metzenbaum told Saddam, I am now aware that you are a strong & intelligent man, & that you want peace." Senator Bob Dole, in reply to Saddam's charges that there was a campaign against him in Europe & the U.S., reassured him, Not from President Bush", & added that the President would veto any congressional sanctions. Senator Alan Simpson said that, I believe your problem is with the Western media, which are spoiled & conceited." After the meeting, Dole reported back to Bush that Saddam is a leader to whom the U.S. can talk."

Saddam Was America's Thug

George Bush then President of the United States, often referred to Saddam as a ruthless dictator, a modern day Hitler, a thug etc., & the Western media's portrayal of Saddam could lead one to believe that this is why the war was fought. However, even if Saddam is guilty of half the accusations leveled against him, one must remember that the U.S. knew full well that he was all of these things for years. They not only knew it, but actively supported, armed & protected him while he committed all these alleged atrocities. The World is full of thugs, tyrants & dictators, many of which are much worse than Saddam, yet the U.S. has not felt the need to mount a crusade to forcefully destroy them.
Noam Chomsky, a professor of linguistics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology & a long time peace activist, explained it thus: The cynicism* is transparent. The only Third World forces regarded as legitimate by the U.S. are those who understand & serve U.S. priorities. Until August 1 (1991) Saddam Hussein was a favored ally & trading partner. His criminal atrocities were easily overlooked; others whose records are as unsavory as his continue to be amiable* friends. In reality, Saddam Hussein became the new incarnation* of Hitler & Genghis Khan when he revealed himself to be a `radical nationalist' who rejected the doctrine that the energy reserves of the Gulf are to be controlled by the U.S. & reliable client states. At that point, his monstrous record can be invoked as a propaganda device. Similar examples of a quick transition from amity to enmity include General Manuel Noriega of Panama, who had been aided & supported by the U.S. until he ceased to serve its interests."

So despite all the sensational publicity to the contrary, it cannot be argued persuasively that the U.S. invaded Iraq because Saddam was evil. That he may be evil probably makes the average American feel better about the decision to go to war, but it should not be confused with the real reason for why they chose to go.


Next