By Stephanie Simon
The Bible says God created man in
His image. Biologists say man evolved from primordial muck.
Steve Abrams, a member of the Kansas
Board of Education, considers both versions and then asks: Why is
one more scientific than the other? True, we can't prove God created
us. But neither can we prove that monkeys became men. Neither theory
can be tested in the lab. Neither can be directly observed.
So neither, he concludes, should
be taught in school.
This is the new creationist crusade:
Instead of trying to push the Bible into biology class, they're
working to kick Charles Darwin out.
In a fresh twist on an old debate,
conservative Christians have given up insisting that public schools
teach the Book of Genesis as science. That approach violates a Supreme
Court decision.
Learning from defeat after defeat
in the courts, they have fashioned a new approach. They focus instead
on the theory of evolution, insisting it's too preposterously speculative
to merit a place in the science curriculum.
"In the scientific field, we
should be studying science: facts that can be documented, observed
and measured. That's what I want for our kids," said Abrams,
a veterinarian who leads a creationist bloc on the education board.
"Evolution is not good science, and, as such, we don't believe
it should be presented."
Polls consistently show that at least
44% of Americans believe God created life as described in Genesis:
Over the course of six days, He separated day from night and created
every species of life, culminating with Adam and Eve. A roughly
equal percentage accept evolution but think God had a hand in guiding
it. Only about 10% believe in strict evolution, unaided by external
forces.
Public queasiness about the Darwinian
gospel is starting to creep into education policy. Consider:
* In Alabama, all biology texts must
carry a sticker advising that evolution is an "unproven belief"
and "should be considered a theory." The sticker also
lists several "unanswered questions" about evolution--such
as the
lack of transitional fossils showing, for example, a half-fish,
half-amphibian.
* In Nebraska, the attorney general
recently warned the Board of Education that a new science curriculum
that presented evolution as fact might violate the state's constitutional
guarantee of freedom of conscience since "students would be
forced to accept as true something that contradicted their religion."
The board revised the curriculum to teach evolution as a theory.
* In Kansas, the creationist view
has earned considerable public support. In a recent Sunday editorial,
the Topeka Capital-Journal opined that "creationism is as good
a hypothesis as any for how the universe began" and urged schools
to teach both views of our origins.